The most common way to understand the impact of a disease is to track its rates of prevalence and mortality because these metrics are derived from easily collected data. However, prevalence and mortality rates fail to capture whether a disease is becoming more dangerous without necessarily becoming more directly deadly.
This report uses multiple-cause mortality data for the universe of US death certificates from 2006 to 2019 to explore the distribution of factors contributing to death. We examine the role of “metabolic illnesses,” broadly defined as illnesses that occur due to abnormalities in the body’s metabolic process. Although these illnesses all impact the same system, they may have very different causes, presentations, risk factors, and impacts on quality of life.
We explore how these contributors changed in frequency for all causes of death and for each of the top causes of death in the United States between 2006 and 2019. We also examine how these changes differed based on sex, race, and ethnicity.
Katherine Sacks, PhD
Related Content
-
Coverage and Reimbursement Roadmap for Women’s Health Innovation
Women's health has long been underserved by a coverage system built around inadequate research, insufficient billing codes, and payers that have been slow to recognize conditions that affect women exclusively, differentially, or...View Research
LM
-
Employers Investing in Women: Advancing Business, Employees, and Communities
Women represent 47 percent of the US workforce and contribute 37 percent to the global gross domestic product, yet data show that women’s health continues to face significant underinvestment across many disease conditions that affect women...Read Report -
Effective yet Undervalued: Elevating Community Health Workers
Community health workers (CHWs) are frontline public health workers who are trusted and have a clear understanding of the communities they serve. They have proven effective in community interventions ranging from health education to...View ResearchCommunity health workers (CHWs) are frontline public health workers who are trusted and have a clear understanding of the communities they serve.
AP
-
The Evolving Role and Economic Impact of Employers in Communities
The Employer Action Exchange (EAE) has identified eight emerging and escalating risks that employers should consider. These eight risks—mental health, physical security, artificial intelligence, weather events, economic uncertainty, talent...Read Report -
A New Era: Cross-Industry Executive Perspectives on Building Resilience
For employers looking upstream who want to base their strategic decisions on real-world, timely examples, learnings, and opportunities, there is tremendous value in hearing about the challenges and successes of fellow C-suite leaders.View Research -
Employer Priorities: Advancing Organizational and Employee Health
Employers are uniquely positioned to drive internal and external change and meaningful outcomes for employees, their businesses, and surrounding communities through four key levers captured in the Milken Institute Employer Action Exchange...Read Report -
Employers Mitigating Risk and Building Resilience: Response to Early-Onset Cancer
Employers are uniquely positioned to anticipate and respond to emerging and escalating risks that impact their employees, businesses, and surrounding communities through the Milken Institute’s Employer Action Exchange (EAE) framework. The...Read ReportEmployers are uniquely positioned to anticipate and respond to emerging and escalating risks that impact their employees, businesses, and surrounding communities through the Milken Institute’s...
-
Saluting Service and Bolstering Business: Redefining Employer Investments in Veterans
Intentional employer investments are pivotal to the health and performance of people, communities, and businesses.Read Report -
Opportunities for Local Mammography Deployment
There is considerable variation in mammography deployment, utilization, and breast cancer detection across the United States.View Research
AP