Regulation has a vital role in any financial system—and changes to U.S. financial regulation were clearly needed in the wake of the financial crisis. However, in a constantly evolving economy, discussion over the proper calibration of financial regulation should never really stop. Because banking and other financial services cannot be entirely de-risked, at least not without losing the benefits that we as a society expect from the financial sector, completely eliminating risk is not a plausible goal of regulation. Banks and other financial intermediaries need to take on risk to support a growing and dynamic economic engine.
A key challenge with regulatory policy is to ensure that financial institutions cannot put taxpayers or the broad economy in a precarious situation when their business decisions do not work out. The challenge that we as a society face is to find the balance between safety and risk-taking. Just as we must continue to oversee our banks and financial institutions to ensure that they do not shunt their risks off onto the taxpayer and the broader economy, we must also continue to oversee our regulatory regime to maintain a strong financial sector that contributes to growth in the real economy.
The start of a new administration is a natural time to assess the U.S. financial regulatory structure. The goal of our analysis here is to help ensure that the regulatory system protects consumers and the broader economy without putting unnecessary downward pressure on economic growth and financial innovation. We believe that improvements can be made to America’s regulatory infrastructure, and here we suggest 10 policy changes as a start.
The Milken Institute Center for Financial Markets provided a response to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) upon request for comments regarding special purpose national bank charters for FinTech companies. The white paper...
This paper seeks to examine the implications of who should regulate FinTech, and how the answer may affect both company and consumer use of financial services. Given the scope and diversity of FinTech, the paper’s representation of the...
The Milken Institute ("Institute") appreciates the opportunity to submit comments in response to the Senate Banking Committee’s (“Committee’s”) Request for Information (“RFI”) on digital asset market structure. As a nonpartisan, nonprofit...
The Milken Institute and the Motsepe Foundation are proud to announce the winner of the Milken-Motsepe Prize in FinTech, a $2 million innovation award designed to reward companies working to expand access to capital and financial services...
The story of Oze starts in the Peace Corps. I, Meghan McCormick, served as a community economic development advisor in Guinea, while my cofounder served in Benin. We saw firsthand how these business owners had to navigate complex...
The Honorable Bill Hagerty United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Hagerty, We thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on your discussion draft of the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act of 2024. We commend your...
In This Issue Foreword from Milken Institute FinTech Director, Nicole Valentine Inclusion at Scale: Innovative Financial Systems with Jo Ann Barefoot Building Trust in Innovative Finance with Richard Berner Inclusion by Design: Going Beyond...
The FinTech Program of the Milken Institute is pleased to provide comments on the Digital Asset Market Structure Discussion Draft (“Discussion Draft”) by the US House Committee on Financial Services and the US House Committee on Agriculture...